For Immediate Release: Wednesday 8 October 2003

 

 

IMA URGES MARKET-LED SOLUTION NOT FURTHER REGULATION ON SOFT COMMISSION AND UNBUNDLING RESEARCH

The Investment Management Association (IMA) today urged the Financial Services Authority not to introduce proposals for ending or restricting soft commissions and bundled brokerage services.  

In a speech to City practitioners, Richard Saunders, Chief Executive of the IMA, said “We believe a combination of market solutions and improved transparency will offer a more flexible and dynamic way of dealing with the issues highlighted in CP 176, rather than the introduction of a series of new and detailed regulations with unknown consequences.”  

Mr Saunders said that the FSA’s proposals raised serious issues of proportional regulation. The costs at issue amounted to no more than one-fortieth of one per cent on fund performance.  But, he pointed out, the potential costs to pension funds and other clients are many times this. “That,” he added, “is without considering the cost to the economy if business goes offshore.”   

The speech went on to highlight a number of “unintended consequences” of the FSA’s proposals. First, the amount of freely distributed original company and market research will fall substantially if the proposals are adopted, affecting the efficiency of the market. According to research carried out for the IMA by Charles River Associates (CRA), dealing spreads could increase by as much 15 per cent. “That would imply increased costs of up to 20 basis points, dwarfing any savings within the 2 – 3 basis points cost of bundled and softed services”, said Mr Saunders. 

Secondly, the CRA research concluded that there would be a “significant probability of relocation” of assets managed in the UK.  With UK houses managing some £900 billion of assets on behalf of overseas institutional clients, the consequences for UK competitiveness need to be considered very carefully. 

The approach advocated by the IMA is “one of disclosure and transparency”, said Mr Saunders. The industry has already taken some significant steps in this direction with the introduction, in July, of the IMA/NAPF pension fund disclosure code, already adopted by 94 per cent of fund managers. The code is designed to inform pension fund trustees in detail about transaction costs, use of brokers, soft commissions and other transactional arrangements. 

The text of Mr Saunders’ speech is attached.

-Ends- 

Richard Saunders, Chief Executive, IMA                        020 7831 0898

Helen Stephenson, Communications Officer, IMA           020 7831 0898

Jeanette Hamster, CardewChancery                             020 7930 0777

Notes to editors: 

1. The Investment Management Association 

The Investment Management Association (IMA) is the trade body for the UK investment management industry. It was formed in February 2002 as a result of a merger between the Fund Managers’ Association (FMA) and the Association of Unit Trusts and Investment Funds (AUTIF). IMA’s members provide investment management services to institutions (for example, life assurance companies, pension funds, and individual companies) and to private investors, through individual fund management agreements and pooled products such as authorised investment funds. Between them, IMA’s members manage over £2,000 billion worth of assets. 

2.  The Charles River Associates study 

The IMA commissioned Charles River Associates to conduct an independent appraisal of the impact of the FSA’s proposals set out in CP 176 (“Bundled Brokerage and Soft Commissions”) The CRA carried out in depth interviews with 30 trustees, fund managers, brokers and independent research houses and information providers. These were supplemented with a quantitative survey (based on a 10 page questionnaire) of 80 pension funds and fund managers. 

3. The FSA proposals  

The FSA proposals are summarised in CP 176 in the following terms:

  1. “We propose to limit the goods and services, beyond trade execution, that can be bought in the first instance with commission or order flow. Specifically, we propose excluding market pricing and information services, such as dealing screens…..”
  2. “We propose that the cost of acquiring any other services in a package along with trade execution should not be passed through automatically by a fund manager to his customers’ funds. This would apply in particular to the use of commission to buy investment research.”

 


65 Kingsway London WC2B 6TD 

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7831 0898 Fax:+44 (0) 20 7831 9975 

www.investmentuk.org 

Investment Management Association is a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales Registered number 4343737.  Registered office as above. 

 

 

© IMA 2002. Last Updated: 01 November 2006